Legal Opinion
Armour & Co. v. Celic
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 6, 1961No. 374, Docket 26852PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEEL, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Armour & Company, asserts that on February 1, 1956 it entered into a written contract with Suffolk Farmers Cooperative Association, Inc., of James-port, New York. The writing was designated at the top in large letters, “Contract of Limited Agency.” It provided that plaintiff would consign to the Cooperative for sale, on commission and for the account of plaintiff, on prices and terms to be fixed by plaintiff, such quantities and brands of fertilizer as might be mutually agreed upon from time to time, that all fertilizer delivered to the Cooperative, until…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hutchison v. RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1933
- American Tobacco Co. v. The Katingo HadjipateraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
- Brainard v. N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Brainard v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Hunt Ltd. v. Lifschultz Fast Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Graham v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Graham v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Menendez v. Saks And CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Murphy Tugboat Co. v. Shipowners & Merchants Towboat Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1979
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.