Legal Opinion

Hardy v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 15, 1959No. 37782PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

1. Regarding the- scienter necessary to be proved before one may be convicted of receiving stolen goods under Code § 26-2620, knowing them to have been stolen, the rule is laid down in Von Sprecken v. State, 70 Ga. App. 222, 224 (28 S. E. 2d 341) as follows: “Before one can be convicted of receiving stolen goods it must appear from the evidence that he knew the property was stolen when he received it. It is true that the jury in determining whether a defendant had such knowledge can consider all of the evidence, direct and circumstantial, tending to show such knowledge. They…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Birdsong v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Bird v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  3. Fowler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Von Sprecken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  5. Smallwood v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Prather v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  2. Nair v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. McGill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  4. Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API