Prather v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Bell, Presiding Judge.
1. Knowledge that goods are stolen is an essential element of the crime of receiving stolen goods. Sanford v. State, 4 Ga. App. 449 (61 SE 741). Where one admits buying and receiving goods shown by undisputed evidence to have been stolen, the burden is still upon the State to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the transaction occurred with guilty knowledge on the part of the accused. Chambers v. State, 94 Ga. App. 531 (95 SE2d 326); McGill v. State, 106 Ga. App. 482, 483 (127 SE2d 332). In most cases scienter is not susceptible of direct proof. “Circumstances may…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Carnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Cobb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Cannon v. GrimesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
- Licette v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
- McGill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Parrott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Hudgins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Reedman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Williamson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.