Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Continental Casualty Company

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 20, 1975PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Judge.

Plaintiff Charlotte Goodman [plaintiff] was injured in an automobile accident in which the owner and operator of the other automobile was not covered by liability insurance. Plaintiff’s husband, with two vehicles registered in Delaware, obtained insurance coverage from defendant with respect to both vehicles, contained in a single insurance policy.

The issue is whether, since plaintiff’s husband paid premium based upon ownership and coverage of two automobiles, plaintiff is entitled to recover damages up to $20,000 under the uninsured motorist coverage, or whether plaintiff is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1965
  2. Laird v. Employers Liability Assurance Corp.Superior Court of Delaware · 1941
  3. Callaway v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1968
  4. Moore v. Home Indemnity CompanySuperior Court of Delaware · 1971

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Lopez Ex Rel. Estate of Lopez v. Foundation Reserve InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArmsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  3. Sanders v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  4. Safeco Insurance v. VetreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  5. Cheseroni v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API