Llewelyn v. Industrial Commission
Utah Supreme Court
1Dissent
LATIMER, Justice.
I dissent.
As I interpret the majority opinion, it, in effect, announces the rule that when a husband and wife are not divorced but are living separate and apart dependency is determined by legal liability to support. Such a holding is contrary to the plain wording of our statute and overturns a principle that has been sustained by this court for many years. Even were I to consider that the previously decided cases should be overruled, to join with the prevailing members of this court, I would be required to ignore the statutory enactments.
Perhaps it might be helpful to set…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McGarry v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1925
- McGarry v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1923
- Diaz v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1932
- Utah Fuel Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1932
- Utah-Apex Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.