Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 21, 1917No. 4685PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRENDERGAST, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for accomplice, to arson and the jury assessed his punishment at the lowest prescribed by law at the time of the trial, and recommended his sentence be' suspended.

In one count appellant was indicted as an accomplice to arson— the arson committed by Raymond Williams and Otis Allen. In another' count as an accomplice of an attempt of arson by the same persons. He properly pleaded for a suspended sentence: The court submitted to the jury both of said counts for a finding and also the law of suspended sentence as applicable to each. The jury found him…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Kaufman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Carlisle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1893
  4. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lamkin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. Dinklage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  3. Parrish v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API