Oluschak Unemployment Compensation Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
Montgomery, J.:
I have dissented in this case because throughout the record it appears that a striking employe must take formal action to give notice to his employer of the termination of his employment before he may seek such employment elsewhere that will be recognized as a basis for unemployment compensation. I do not understand that requirement to be the law. If the evidence proves the fact that the employe in good faith (and not merely as a device to avoid the effects of section 402(d) of the Unemployment Compensation law) seeks and secures new permanent employment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mark Hopkins, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- In re the Claims of LasherNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- In re the Claims of LasherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954