Witt v. Byrum

Appellant brought this suit, as shown by his brief, against appellee for the recovery of $457, claimed to be due him by appellee .as commissions for the sale of 228 acres of land to Keeble & Ridley, alleging that the same was originally listed with him and the firm of Klein & Witt, who were authorized to sell the same at $45 per acre; that thereafter, during the month of April, 1909, appellee authorized appellant to sell said land to said Keeble & Ridley for $40, exclusive of the crops then growing thereon, and agreed to pay appellant a commission of 5 per cent, on the sale thereof; that, by…