Legal Opinion

United States v. Connelly

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided February 24, 1955No. Crim. A. 8622PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, Chief Judge.

The defendants have set forth four separate branches of their motion. The first branch seeks to have expunged from the record two paragraphs of the report of the Grand Jury of September 17, 1954, which was made to the Court at the time the indictment herein was returned. It is not necessary for this Court, on this motion, to determine whether the Grand Jury exceeded its prerogatives in advising the judge in charge of that body, and in making public, the nature of the investigation which it was conducting and which allegedly necessitated a continuance of its existence.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Hall v. Geiger-Jones Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. BrennanDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1955
  2. United States v. RaffDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. State v. BrookinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  4. United States v. LaveryDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
  5. Application of Deborah JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API