Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1941No. O-4025Published

1Opinion of the Court

Honorable George H. Sheppard Comptroller of Public Accounts Austin, Texas Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-4025 Re: Gas Production Tax Claim against Canadian River Gas Company - determination of “:~-?arkct value” of natural I,&:; w~.~erArticle 7047b, l>rior to May I, 1941, We are in receipt of your I<:lt<:r ~1 S&~iilber 23, 1941, which reads as follows: “We have recently made an investigation of the books and records of the Canadian River Gas Company. This company is the producer of gas which supplies through affiliates the gas used in Amarillo and Dalhart, Texas; Denver and Colorado Sprin!;s,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. American Manufacturing Co. v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Wallace v. HinesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Baltic Mining Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Hope Natural Gas Co. v. Hall, State Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Davis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API