Legal Opinion

Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 29, 1994No. CX-93-2449PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHUMACHER, Judge.

Canadian General Insurance Company appeals from the district court’s denial of Canadian General’s motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm.

FACTS

Respondent Domtar, Inc. is a Canadian corporation with its principal place of business in Montreal, Quebec. Canadian General is also a Canadian corporation; its principal offices are in Scarborough, Ontario.

In 1924, Dominion Tar & Chemical Company Ltd., a predecessor to Domtar, opened and began operating a tar plant in Duluth, Minnesota. The plant was in operation from 1924 until 1948, when it was shut…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Nippon Carbide Industries Co., Inc., a Japanese CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  2. Waste Management, Inc. v. Admiral Ins. Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
  3. Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Guinness Import Co. v. Mark VII Distributors, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  5. Red Wing Shoe Co. v. Hockerson-Halberstadt, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API