Legal Opinion

Lemnos Broad Silk Works, Inc. v. Spiegelberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1926PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtValente, J.

In this case, which was tried before me without a jury, the principal question at issue is whether defendants are liable for some thirty-six pieces of silk consigned by plaintiff to defendants as collateral security for an indebtedness, and which subsequently disappeared in a manner both unaccountable and unaccounted for. It should be perhaps noted at the outset that plaintiff charges no fraud or bad faith against defendants. It does not claim, nor has it proven, any conversion or the gleaning of any benefit by defendants. It predicates its case upon the theory that since the goods were…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Marvin v. . BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Newburger-Morris Co. v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Bertig v. NormanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Wintringham v. . HayesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  5. Jackson v. . StrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1917

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Farmer v. O'CarrollCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  2. Cfc Fabrication, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. Dunn Construction Company, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  3. Moe v. American Ice & Cold Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. GreenbergCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  5. Rhodes v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API