Legal Opinion

Frank Tavano v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 29, 1993No. 91-4078PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

In Brafman v. United States, 384 F.2d 863 (5th Cir.1967), our predecessor circuit wrote in dictum that a notice of tax deficiency sent to a taxpayer by the Internal Revenue Service need not be signed in order to be valid. Id. at 865 n. 4 (citing Commissioner v. Oswego Falls Corp., 71 F.2d 673, 677 (2d Cir.1934), and 9 Jacob Mertens, Jr., Federal Income Taxation § 49.186 (1965)). 1 We now expressly so hold. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the tax court holding appellant Tavano liable for tax deficiencies and additions. 2

I

On April 5, 1988, Tavano received from the Commissioner of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. Edward M. ZollaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Olsen v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  4. United States of America and Dennis J. Hanzel, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Jay T. WillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  5. COMMISSIONER OF INT. REVENUE v. Oswego Falls Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Vincent C. Wiley v. United States of America Citizens Federal Mortgage Corporation State of Ohio Franklin County Treasurer and Houng ThaiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Buser v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
  3. Selgas v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  4. Anonymous v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2006
  5. Barnes v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API