Legal Opinion

Hemperly v. George Sliman & Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1937No. 1716PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DORE, Judge.

The defendant George Sliman & Co. obtained a judgment against R. T.‘Hemperly, the father of plaintiff herein, on October 17, 1930, for something over $753, subject to certain credits. Under a writ of fi. fa. issued on said judgment from the district court of Vernon parish, there was seized in the parish of Beauregard, on August 23, 1935, a certain piece of real estate and store building standing in the name of plaintiff herein; and, also by garnishment process, there was seized the sum of $490 on deposit in the City Savings Bank & Trust Company of Deridder, in the name of R. T.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Edenborn v. BlacksherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  2. George Sliman Co. v. HemperlyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Spencer v. BanisterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
  4. Gray v. Succession of BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Archie McConnell v. The Travelers Indemnity Company and Employers Casualty Company of DallasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  2. Victor Mortgage Co. v. ArnoffCuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1952
  3. Hemperly v. George Sliman & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API