Legal Opinion

Billy E. Burnett, Cross-Appellants v. The Coleman Company, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 10, 1974No. 74-1594 and 74-1595PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment in a products liability action. The only substantial question raised herein concerns the District Court’s use of remittitur to reduce the size of the judgment, an issue which is presented by cross-appeal. We affirm the action of the District Court in ordering remittitur and remand with instructions to offer the plaintiffs the option of acceding to the remittitur or electing to retry their claim in a new trial. We also affirm on all the issues raised by the appellants.

This case arose when a portable oven unit, manufactured by Coleman for use with its stoves,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Kennon v. GilmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Alonzo Wayne Taylor v. The Washington Terminal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. Ford Motor Company v. LononTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  5. United States v. 93.970 Acres of LandCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Donovan v. Penn Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Ford v. Guarantee Abstract & Title Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Bobbie Jean Smith and Wife, Jessie Mae Smith v. John Swafford Furniture Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. Parr v. Central Soya Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990
  5. Rodgers v. Fisher Body Division, General Motors Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API