Legal Opinion

Williams v. Long

California Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1900No. Sac. No. 648PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, C.

Appeal from an order refusing to dissolve a. preliminary injunction restraining the defendants “from entering in and upon the mining claim of the plaintiff [called the “Marryatt mine”], and from mining and working thereon, and from taking and removing any gold and gold-bearing earth and rock therefrom, and from in any manner trespassing thereon.”

The injunction was issued without notice on the verified complaint. The complaint is in ejectment, in the ordinary form, but alleges also, in effect, that the defendants are mining the premise's in controversy, and have removed and are…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis v. WestphalMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. San Antonio Water Co. v. BodenhamerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Flood v. E. L. Goldstein Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Dunker v. the Field and Tule ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  5. Santa Clara Valley Water Dist. v. EisenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API