Legal Opinion

Rautenkranz v. Plummer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1921No. 10,782PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From Wabash Circuit Court; Alvah Taylor, Special Judge. Action by Alfred H. Plummer and others on claims against the estate of William Rautenkranz, deceased. From- a judgment for plaintiffs, the administrator of the estate, Fred Rautenkranz appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMcMahan, J.

The law firm composed of Alfred H. Plummer, Walter C. Todd and Franklin D. Plummer filed its claim against the estate of William Rautenkranz for professional services. Herman Hipskind and Warren G. Sayre each filed their separate claim for like services. By agreement the three claims were consolidated for the purpose of trial. Appellant’s demurrers to each of the three claims were overruled and a separate answer in three paragraphs was filed to each claim.

These answers were alike in form. The first paragraph of each was a general denial. The second admitted the claimants had each filed a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carter v. . BeckwithNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Lyon v. MinorMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Guardianship of Carrico v. BennettIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. In re the Estate of KeelingNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. Estate of Prickett v. WomersleyIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. In Re Estate of OstSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Dorris v. CrowderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API