Legal Opinion

Earl Van Winkle v. City of LaVergne

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided September 27, 2001No. M2000-01784-COA-R3-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 9, 2001 Session EARL J. VAN WINKLE, ET AL. v. CITY OF LaVERGNE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Rutherford County No. 39528 Robert E. Corlew, Judge No. M2000-01784-COA-R3-CV - Filed September 27, 2001 This appeal involves the disputed ownership of water lines. The City of LaVergne appeals the trial court’s ruling that the city was the owner of the water lines and responsible for their continued maintenance and repair. LaVergne also appeals the trial court’s award of $3037.31 to the Van Winkles. For the reasons set forth below, we…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bain v. WellsTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Bradley v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  3. Kirby v. MacOn CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Pevear v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  5. Paduch v. City of Johnson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API