Kay v. Kay
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBoss, C. J.
The appeal is from an order sustaining a general demurrer to the complaint and from a judgment of dismissal. The appellant Kay insists that the court erred in its ruling. The complaint sets forth two causes of action. The facts upon which the first cause is based are, in substance, as follows: On June 12, 1933, in the superior court of Maricopa county, J. M. Sears was adjudged an incompetent and a guardian of his person and estate appointed. Subsequently he requested his guardian to employ an attorney, or to furnish him funds out of his estate to do so, to secure his restoration to capacity,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Estate of DoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Lyon v. MinorMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- In Re Guardianship of KaplanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
- Guardianship of SearsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- Rautenkranz v. PlummerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Estate and Guardianship of VermeerschCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Valley National Bank v. LewinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971