Legal Opinion
Williams v. Bowen
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 29, 1987No. 86 Civ. 2129(RJW)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Plaintiff Eileen Williams brings this action pursuant to section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (the “Act”) as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision by the defendant Secretary of Health and Human Services (the “Secretary” of “HHS”) denying her application for widow’s insurance benefits. The Secretary has moved under Rule 12(c), Fed.R. Civ.P., for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiff has cross-moved for judgment on the pleadings. For the reasons to follow, the Court denies both motions and remands the action to the Secretary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Helene Marcus v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Crocker National Bank, and T.O.S. Industries, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant v. Ideco Division of Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Brown v. SullivanDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1989
- Rizzo v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUM. SERV. OF USDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1989
- Williams v. SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991