Legal Opinion

Billy Maurice Ogden v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 10, 1963No. 18446_1PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWNING, Circuit Judge.

On appellant’s appeal from his conviction we remanded to permit the trial court to determine whether certain notes taken by F.B.I. agents during an interview with the witness Glass were a “statement” producible under the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 3500, and, if so, what became of the notes, and what consequences should follow the failure of the government to produce them at the trial. 303 F.2d 724, 737 (9th Cir., 1962).

After a hearing without a jury at which Glass and both F.B.I. agents testified, the trial court found that one of the agents took notes of the pertinent…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Campbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Killian v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. United States v. HoffaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  2. United States v. Joseph CovelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
  3. United States v. Kevin Harrison, United States of America v. Isaac Pendergrast, United States of America v. Juan GordonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. John Michael HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Ramona Cipres and Juan Montes Deoca v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API