Legal Opinion
Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 28, 1994No. 87 Civ. 6125 (DAB)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BATTS, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff moved for partial summary judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Defendants cross-moved for summary judgment. Judge Kimba M. Wood issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order dated October 14, 1992, denying plaintiffs motion and granting in part and denying in greater part defendants’ cross-motion. Defendants timely moved for reconsideration, which was opposed by plaintiff, and, before the motion was decided, the parties began settlement discussions with Magistrate Judge Sharon E. Grubin. Accordingly, the court directed that the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. Buffalo Reinsurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- Ruiz v. Commissioner of the Department of TransportationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Park South Tenants Corporation v. 200 Central Park South Associates, L.P., Bernard Spitzer, Jack Lipman, and Melvin D. LipmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Park South Tenants Corp. v. 200 Central Park South Associates, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morales v. Quintiles Transnational Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Polin v. Kellwood Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Consigli & Associates, LLC v. Maplewood Senior Living, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022