Legal Opinion

Clayborne v. Omaha Public Power District

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided July 25, 2002No. 4:00CV540PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KOPF, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court on the Magistrate Judge’s report and recommendation (filing 53) and on Plaintiffs’ statement of objections thereto (filing 56), filed as allowed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and NELR 72.4.

Upon de novo review, I find that inasmuch as Magistrate Judge Piester has fully, carefully, and correctly found the facts and applied the law, the report and recommendation should be adopted, and Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification (filing 45) and motion for oral argument (filing 51) should be denied.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that:(1)…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stubbs v. McDonald's Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
  2. Catlin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
  3. Nelson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2007
  4. Brown v. KerkhoffDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2012
  5. Yapp v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API