Legal Opinion

White v. Polk County

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 6, 1864PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from Pollc District Court. In the absence of the district attorney, plaintiff was appointed by the District Court in Polk county, special prosecutor for tbe August term, 1861. This action is brought to recover for the value of the services rendered, pursuant to such appointment. The other material facts will appear from the opinion. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, Ch. J.

1. district power toap-point' I. It is first claimed that the District Court has no authority to appoint a prosecutor; that the office of district attorney is a State office, and his place can only be supplied by the governor in the manner provided by law. We do not understand that there was a vacancy in the office of district attorney; but that the incumbent was temporarily absent, being prevented, by. necessary absence from the State, from attending to his duties, at the time named, in Polk county. It was never contemplated that the power of the governor to fill vacancies in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Samuels v. County of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Filarsky v. DeliaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. Wayne Circuit Judges v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Baker v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
  4. Webster County Board of Supervisors v. FlatterySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. Grand Traverse County v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API