Legal Opinion
Evans v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 10, 2016No. 16-717CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Motion for Discovery; RCFC 26; Supplementation of the Administrative Record
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DISCOVERY AND TO SUPPLEMENT THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
FIRESTONE, Senior Judge
Pending before the court in the above-captioned military pay case is plaintiff David 0. Evans’s motion for discovery (ECF No. 16), filed October 4, 2016. Mr. Evans states that he is entitled to discovery pursuant to Rule 26 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) in order to supplement the administrative record.
I. BACKGROUND
Mr. Evans filed his complaint in this case on June 20, 2016, seeking…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Manker v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2025