Legal Opinion

Cruz v. Northwestern Chrysler Plymouth Sales, Inc.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1997No. 82619, 82726 consPublished

1Opinion of the Court 1

Docket Nos. 82619, 82726 cons.–Agenda 24–September 1997.

VIRGINIA CRUZ, Appellant, v. NORTHWESTERN CHRYSLER PLYMOUTH SALES, INC., et al. , Appellees.–JEFFREY KOLAR et al. , Appellants, v. ARLINGTON TOYOTA, INC., Appellee.

Opinion filed November 20, 1997.

2Opinion of the Court · HarrisonJustice Harrison

These two consolidated appeals present a common issue: What procedure should plaintiffs follow to obtain statutory attorney fee awards where their causes of action have been submitted to mandatory court-annexed arbitration in accordance the rules of this court? In each of the cases before us, the fee petitions were presented to and ruled upon by…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haskell v. BlumthalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  2. Chesrow v. Du Page Auto Brokers, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  3. Kolar v. Arlington Toyota, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  4. Cruz v. Northwestern Chrysler Plymouth Sales, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API