Legal Opinion

Motley v. State Board of Barber Examiners

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 10, 1947PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

The array of parties plaintiff has given rise to some doubt as to their community of interest in the subject matter of the proceeding; and considered individually their standing in court as qualified suitors for equitable relief has been challenged.

The plaintiffs Motley and Cox are registered barbers of long standing and the complaint that they are discriminated against because they were compelled to stand examination while the defendant Young and others in his class are not so required, without further allegation of injury would seem merely reminiscent. In that respect the gist of Cox’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. Westchester County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Valley Nat. Bank of Phoenix v. GloverArizona Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Bridges Ex Rel. City of Charlotte v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Adams v. Standard Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Matter of Barthelmess v. . CukorNew York Court of Appeals · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Smith v. KeatorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Cheek v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Guthrie v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Poor Richard's, Inc. v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. Vinson v. ChappellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API