Legal Opinion

Johns v. Johns

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1959No. Civ. No. 18293Published

1Opinion of the Court

WAGLER, J. pro tem.*

On September 3, 1957, plaintiff filed her first amended complaint naming as defendants her husband, W. Harry Johns, from whom she had obtained an interlocutory decree of divorce, one Arnett and respondents herein.

Thereafter all of the defendants except Johns and Arnett who are not parties to this appeal filed demurrers. These were by order of the court sustained and from the judgment entered thereon plaintiff has appealed.

Respondents assert that the appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order sustaining demurrer was entered with plaintiff’s consent.

The record…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reed v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Hibernia Savings Etc. Soc. v. WaymireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. John H. Spohn Co. v. BenderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Wilson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Christina v. R. Z. Adams Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API