Legal Opinion

In re Polypropylene Carpet Antitrust Litigation

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided June 2, 1997No. MDL No. 1075PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HAROLD L. MURPHY, District Judge.

This is an antitrust case in which Plaintiffs claim Defendants conspired to maintain artificially .the price of polypropylene carpet. The case is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Motion to Certify Class Action [18], Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Brief [53], and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Submit Supplemental Authority [59].1

*6081. Background

This action consists of nearly 20 private antitrust lawsuits consolidated and transferred to this Court on October 4, 1995, by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Each lawsuit…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In re Terazosin Hydrochloride Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2004
  2. In re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  3. In re Flat Glass Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. In re Visa Check/Mastermoney Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
  5. In re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API