Legal Opinion · Dissent

Courtney v. Apple

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1956No. Docket 49, Calendar 46,500Published

1DissentSharpe, J.

The principal issue involved in this case may be stated as follows: Did the trial- court abuse its discretion in granting a partial retrial? The order granting a partial retrial contains the following:

“In his argument to the jury defense counsel made a point of contributory carelessness on the part of the decedent’s mother. This argument, despite the court’s charge that the only question- to be- considered (aside from amount of pecuniary injury) was that of defendant’s negligence, may have been carried into the jury room. - If such assumption be correct then the verdict rests on the false…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fort Wayne & Belle Isle Railway Co. v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Deffenbaugh v. Inter-State Motor Freight Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Wheeler v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. O'Brien v. Judge of Recorder's CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API