Legal Opinion

State of Indiana v. Gregory Lagrone

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 2013No. 49A05-1203-CR-135PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE 1

The State charged Gregory Lagrone with one count of dealing in marijuana and one count of possession of marijuana, as Class D felonies. Lagrone filed a motion to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant that was obtained and executed after police had entered Lagrone’s residence and secured the premises. Following a hearing, the trial court granted the motion to suppress, effectively preventing prosecution of Lagrone. In the State’s appeal, we consider the following issues sua sponte:

1.Whether the insertion of a global positioning device…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Victor Keeylen v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. William C. Kinslow v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API