Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Chenet

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 1975No. Appeal, 253PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Jacobs, J.,

The appellant, Richard P. Chenet, was charged with possession of marijuana and was convicted by a jury. He subsequently filed a motion for a new trial alleging trial errors and a motion in arrest of judgment arguing that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. The court granted the motion for a new trial because of improper comments made by the prosecutor; but refused the motion in arrest of judgment. The defendant has appealed from the refusal of the arrest of judgment.1

*229The facts reveal that deputy sheriffs in Beaver County received information from a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Commonwealth v. WinebrennerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Commonwealth v. SamuelsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. AmbersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChenetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Commonwealth v. LiddickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. MinoskeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API