Commonwealth v. Chenet
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Jacobs, J.,
The appellant, Richard P. Chenet, was charged with possession of marijuana and was convicted by a jury. He subsequently filed a motion for a new trial alleging trial errors and a motion in arrest of judgment arguing that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict. The court granted the motion for a new trial because of improper comments made by the prosecutor; but refused the motion in arrest of judgment. The defendant has appealed from the refusal of the arrest of judgment.1
*229The facts reveal that deputy sheriffs in Beaver County received information from a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Commonwealth v. WinebrennerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. SamuelsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. AmbersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ChenetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. LiddickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. MinoskeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.