People v. Harding
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.
Convicted on five counts charging fraudulent issuance of bad checks (Pen. Code, § 476a), defendant has appealed from the judgment. Appearing in propria persona, he has presented briefs which appear upon analysis to constitute an argument that because the evidence is conflicting, and because defendant categorically denied any fraudulent intent in his issuance of checks against an admittedly overdrawn account, the judgment is not supported by the evidence. In other words, the argument proceeds upon the erroneous notion that this court may reweigh the evidence.
It would serve no purpose here to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. OtteyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Gantner v. GantnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- People v. CorriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. WeaverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- People v. OsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. BandyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. PrivitierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- People v. GreenwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962