Legal Opinion

Shoulberg v. Public Utility District No. 1

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 29, 2012No. 41545-3-IIPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPenoyar, J.

¶1 Ted Shoulberg and Charles Haniford brought a class action suit on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated (collectively Owners), challenging a tax levied by Jefferson County Public Utility District Number 1 (District). The Owners appeal the trial court’s order granting the District’s summary judgment motion and denying the Owners’ summary judgment motion. The Owners argue that the expenditures the District made constitute “provision of a water utility” and, therefore, duplicate the city of Port Townsend’s (City) water utility operations, in violation of RCW 54.04.030. The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Young v. Key Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. ThorneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Jones v. Allstate InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Jones v. Allstate Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 587 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fabre v. Town of RustonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Old City Hall LLC v. Pierce County Aids FoundationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. Citizens Alliance v. San Juan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  4. Citizens Alliance, App. v. San Juan County, Resps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  5. Old City Hall v. Pierce County Aids FoundationCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API