Farabee v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
McDonald, judge.
The indictment charged the appellant with the theft of a check of the value of more than fifty dollars. Upon conviction his punishment was assessed at a term of two years.
Appellant made a motion to quash the indictment on the ground that the check was not sufficiently described. The motion *223was timely presented, considered and overruled. Proper exception was reserved. Cox v. State, 7 Tex.App. 495. This cause has been before us on a former appeal. We reversed and remanded the case, Farabee v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 362 S.W.2d 117, in an opinion by the writer, because of the trial…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Luce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Calentine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Fulshear v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Sasse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Terry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Bynum v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1986
- Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Bynum v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.