Legal Opinion

Farabee v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 1963No. 35847PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonald, judge.

The indictment charged the appellant with the theft of a check of the value of more than fifty dollars. Upon conviction his punishment was assessed at a term of two years.

Appellant made a motion to quash the indictment on the ground that the check was not sufficiently described. The motion *223was timely presented, considered and overruled. Proper exception was reserved. Cox v. State, 7 Tex.App. 495. This cause has been before us on a former appeal. We reversed and remanded the case, Farabee v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 362 S.W.2d 117, in an opinion by the writer, because of the trial…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Luce v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Calentine v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Fulshear v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Sasse v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Terry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1971
  3. Bynum v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1986
  4. Bynum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  5. Bynum v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API