Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Garnett

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 11, 1992No. 2258PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Appellant, Walter Garnett, Jr., has appealed from an order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. In a brief filed by appointed counsel, it is argued that trial counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to seek the suppression of inculpatory statements made by appellant following an arrest which is alleged to have been illegal because it was made in violation of the Statewide Municipal Police Jurisdiction Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 8953. Appellant has also filed a pro se supplemental brief in which he avers that his court appointed PCRA counsel was ineffective for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Allen v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. PursellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GriffinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. FowlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. Hlubin, M., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Commonwealth v. DrassSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Com. v. Wilson, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API