Barron Fan Technology, Inc. v. Pell City Industrial Services, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentBryan, Justice
The majority affirms the judgment entered by the St. Clair Circuit Court (“the trial court”) on a jury verdict in favor of Pell City Industrial Services, Inc. (“Pell City”). Because I believe the evidence is insufficient to support relief based upon a theory of quantum meruit, I would reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand this cause for a new trial. Therefore, I must respectfully dissent.
“A claim of quantum meruit, or quasi-contract, is a request for equitable relief based on the principle, ‘ “that if one *247knowingly accepts services rendered by another, and the benefit and result…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Alfa Mut. Ins. Co. v. RoushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
- Mantiply v. MantiplySupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Utah Foam Products, Inc. v. Polytec, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Richards v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Vardaman v. Florence City Bd. of Educ.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.