Legal Opinion

Philadelphia Nat. Bank v. Rothensies

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 5, 1942No. 1659PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is a suit to recover income and excess profits tax paid by the plaintiff, a national bank, for the year 1937. All relevant facts have been stipulated.

For the years 1931 to 1936 inclusive, the-plaintiff charged off bad debts in large-amounts and took corresponding deductions in its tax returns. In each year the deductions were greatly in excess of the net income and there was a deficit after the charge-off, the total of such deficits being more than $10,000,000.

In 1937 the plaintiff made recoveries-amounting in all to $393,357.94 on account of the debts so…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Liberty Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  3. National Bank of Commerce v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  4. Nat'l Bank of Commerce v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939
  5. Central Loan & Inv. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hillsboro National Bank v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Helvering v. State-Planters Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  3. Harwick v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  4. Electric Storage Battery Co. v. RothensiesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Budd Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API