Dominik Calhoun, et al. v. California Interscholastic Federation, et al.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 DOMINIK CALHOUN, et al., Case No. 25-cv-04603-LB 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS 13 v. Re: ECF No. 84 14 CALIFORNIA INTERSCHOLASTIC FEDERATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 This putative class action challenges a single rule governing California high-school athletics. 19 In an order dismissing the original complaint, the court held that the California Interscholastic 20 Federation and its ten regional sections (together, CIF) are immune under Parker v.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Stacie Somers v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.