Legal Opinion

Harts v. Johanns

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided June 7, 2006No. 05-1066-WEBPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

WESLEY E. BROWN, Senior District Judge.

Now before the Court is Plaintiffs motion to review a final action by the Farm Service Agency (“FSA”). (Doc. 9); D. Kan. 83.7. The Court takes jurisdiction over this appeal from the FSA’s decision under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 for review under the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”). 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706; 7 U.S.C. § 6999.

I. FACTS.

1. On or about May 15, 1989, Plaintiff entered into a Shared Appreciation Agreement (“SAA”) with the FSA. (R. at 7-8). Under the terms of the agreement, the FSA agreed to reduce Plaintiffs debt in exchange for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Office of Personnel Management v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Don Olenhouse v. Commodity Credit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. Coleman v. B-G Maintenance Management of Colorado, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Western Rangeland Conservation Ass'n v. ZinkeDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2017
  2. Channing v. Seneca-Cayuga NationDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2025
  3. McLean v. United States Customs and Border ProtectionDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API