Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rooney v. Tyson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1998Published

1DissentSmith, J.

By its ruling, the majority heralds a new era in interpreting oral promises of potentially long-term employment. Because I believe the majority’s conclusion is contrary to precedent, policy and practice, I dissent.

The following facts from the certification by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit provide a contextual backdrop for the ensuing legal analysis. Plaintiff Kevin Rooney claims that, pursuant to an oral contract in 1982 between himself and Cus D’Amato, legal guardian and manager of defendant Michael Gerard Tyson, then a minor, he was to train Tyson until Tyson…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Sabetay v. Sterling Drug, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Cron v. Hargro Fabrics, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Burns v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API