Cinevision Corp. v. City of Burbank
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Cinevision Corporation entered into a contract with the City of Burbank to promote concerts in a municipally-owned amphitheater. Ostensibly acting pursuant to the terms of the contract, the Burbank City Council rejected six of Cinevision’s proposed concerts. Cinevision filed an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1982) against the City and a member of the City Council alleging that the entertainers were denied access to a public forum in violation of the first amendment on the basis of the content of their expression and other arbitrary factors. A jury concluded that the…
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by146 opinions
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Club Retro, L.L.C. v. HiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- Smith v. LomaxCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- Norse v. City of Santa CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada Paul R. Brown Greg Gable Gary Peck Shundahai Network Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Committee v. City of Las Vegas Jan Laverty Jones Fremont Street Limited Liability Corp. Mark Paris, American Civil Liberties Union of Nevada Paul R. Brown Greg Gable Gary Peck Shundahai Network Unitarian Universalist Social Justice Committee v. City of Las Vegas Jan Laverty Jones Fremont Street Limited Liability Corp. Mark ParisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.