Legal Opinion

Pound v. Medney

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 23, 1985No. 70836PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beasley, Judge.

In the fall of 1977, plaintiff Medney underwent a series of synthetic fiber hair implants performed by defendant physician Pound; the last was on December 1.

On September 29, before the implants, Medney had signed a “Consent and Release” which stated that he “has agreed to have Dr. Pound perform such experimental implantations into his skin . . . [and he] fully understands that Pound and Hairegenics, Inc. cannot guarantee the medical and esthetic results.” It further stated: “[t]he effect and nature of the operation to be performed, the risks involved and complications,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Marriott Corp. v. American Academy of Psychotherapists, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  2. State Highway Department v. RainesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Mize v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  4. Bowen v. WatersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  5. Woodbury v. WhitmireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brannen v. PrinceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  2. Harris v. TatumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  3. Crosby v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
  4. Prevost v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Packer v. GillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API