Legal Opinion

United States v. Koubriti

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 24, 2003No. 2:01-cr-80778PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO CLOSE JURY VOIR DIRE PROCEEDINGS

ROSEN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendants Karim Koubriti, Ahmed Hannan, Abdel-Ilah El Mardoudi and Far-ouk Ali-Haimoud have moved to close the individual jury voir dire in this case. 1 De fendants maintain that closure of voir dire is necessary to protect their Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to a fair trial. Non-parties, The Detroit News Inc. (the “News”) and The Detroit Free Press, Inc. (the “Free Press”), have filed motions opposing closure. Having reviewed and considered the parties’ respective briefs…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. United States v. AntarCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Horton v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
  2. Abc, Inc. v. Martha Stewart, Peter Bacanovic, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. United States v. KoubritiDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
  4. United States v. ElmardoudiDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007
  5. Davis v. HortonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API