Legal Opinion

Rice v. Rice

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Multnomah County. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLord, J.

This is a suit for a divorce. The defendant demurred to the complaint, upon the ground that the suit had hot been commenced within the time prescribed by the statute. • The court below overruled the demurrer, and the defendant refusing to further plead, upon motion, a default was taken for want of answer, and the suit referred to take and report the testimony. Upon the report of the referee, the cause was heard by the court, and the decree rendered from which this appeal is taken.

The error complained of is the overruling of the demurrer. The Code provides that “the defendant may demur to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pease v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1834

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fast v. WhitneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Eggerth v. EggerthOregon Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Amend v. AmendOregon Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API