Legal Opinion

Amend v. Amend

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1931PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

Plaintiff commenced this suit for divorce on the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. Defendant answered, denying the acts of cruelty alleged in the complaint and prayed for a divorce upon the ground that plaintiff had committed adultery on October 27, 1928, with one Newt Ellis, which charge was denied by the reply. Upon the issues thus joined, the cause was tried in the court below and, from a decree in favor of defendant, plaintiff has appealed.

It appears from the evidence that the parties intermarried at St. Paul, Minnesota, on October 1,1914, and later removed to Oregon, where they have…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jones v. JonesOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Thomsen v. ThomsenOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Parrish v. ParrishOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Saville v. SavilleOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Eggerth v. EggerthOregon Supreme Court · 1888

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Claude v. ClaudeOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State ex rel. Pearcy v. LongOregon Supreme Court · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API