Legal Opinion

Feeney v. Hanover Insurance Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 28, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFORD, Justice.

[¶ 1] Joseph P. Feeney appeals from a judgment of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Saufley, J.) in favor of defendant Hanover Insurance Co. Feeney contends that the court erred in interpreting the uninsured vehicle statute and in concluding that Hanover’s policy provided no uninsured/underin-sured motor vehicle coverage for Feeney’s claim. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment.

[¶ 2] Feeney drank alcohol with Mends and acquaintances at various places on Peaks Island throughout the afternoon and evening of April 26, 1993, and spent much of the evening at Jones…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wescott v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Beaulieu v. BeaulieuSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  3. Connolly v. Royal Globe InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. Gonthier v. HorneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  5. Welch v. McCarthySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Korhonen v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  2. Gagne v. D.E. Jonsen, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2003
  3. Zachary Wilson v. Elizabeth GurneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API