Legal Opinion
People v. Mezon
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 17, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*622Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the evidence adduced at the suppression hearing established that the arrest and subsequent search of the defendant were lawful and proper since he did not produce sufficient identifying data for the police to prepare a uniform traffic summons (see, People v Ellis, 62 NY2d 393; People v Copeland, 39 NY2d 986; People v Wilcox, 198 AD2d 544; People v Rodriguez, 122 AD2d 895).
The defendant was properly sentenced as a persistent violent felony offender, since the certified copies of the judgments of conviction from the clerks of both New York and Westchester…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. EllisNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. CopelandNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. WilcoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. RodriguezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. OmaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. MathisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. ShepardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. OwensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. ReneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998