People v. Mathis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that all of the counts of the indictment are duplicitous (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Schultz, 266 AD2d 919, 919-920, lv denied 94 NY2d 906), and we decline to exercise our power to review that contention as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). The verdict is not contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). County Court properly denied the motion of defendant to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. GiulianoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- People v. VollickNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. VollickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. BatteaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. BaileyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. GibbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. SaintilusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. TaylorNew York Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.