Legal Opinion
State v. Newman
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 3, 1995No. C6-95-427PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARVEY A. HOLTAN, Judge.
Appellant challenges his conviction of a felony drive-by shooting, arguing that the BB gun he shot at another vehicle is not a firearm within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 609.66, subd. le(a) (Supp.1993). We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Dylan Arber Newman was charged with violating the drive-by shooting statute after admitting he shot his BB gun at a Ford on the highway. The driver of the Ford immediately reported the incident to the officer who had stopped appellant’s vehicle for a speeding violation. When the officer asked appellant (a passenger) if he had engaged in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. SpaethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Heaslip v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- State v. SeifertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
3Cited by10 opinions
- State of Minnesota v. David Lee HaywoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- State v. CoauetteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Hare v. State, Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- State of Minnesota v. David Lee HaywoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.